🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a pending law that include reductions in the recommended coverage of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid broader worries about business sector influence with health policies. Recently, WHO officials raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of corporate influence worldwide. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “according to global suggested parameters”, delayed for at least one year after the legislation is approved.

International experts actually suggests a warning should cover at least half of the cigarette package face “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for various offences “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the managing director of the African subsidiary states the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We reside in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and collect the yield and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative commented: “The corporation runs its operations according with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which enable relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that underage people should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to realize planned public health goals, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which includes rising levels of black market activity”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.