🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Expensive

Based on recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $17,000 for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because political disagreements regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income pays approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of our government's defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.