🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an adorable small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but very loyal companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.

Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian amusement park have been entangled in a struggle between a defunct facility, public officials and advocacy groups.

But those working directly with the whales say the intense controversy over their destiny often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities prevented the sale of the belugas to China, the struggling attraction near the famous falls where they are held threatened to end their lives unless the authorities funds the cost of their care. Canada’s fisheries minister has denied that request, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious situation.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Experts say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and communal behavior indicate they are remarkably smart creatures – something a former trainer discovered personally.

She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a role that entailed building relationships of the marine predators.

“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so astounded by the subtleties and quirks in their personalities. She developed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing temperaments.

“Eve selected me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “They altered the way I understand bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Her connection with the whales evolved against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their confinement.

During her three years at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, died. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility attributes to age-related causes, but which activists say points to the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly results of the closure. “Structural materials is falling apart from the tanks because they’re falling apart and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they grab fragments and navigate with pieces in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not reply to a request for comment, but earlier asserted: “The whales … get far superior medical attention and 24/7 supervision than any individual in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Uncertain Future and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the facility in recent months following the death of Eos, an ailing beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the park thought details of the incident were disclosed to the media and she was released soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ fate has left her and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” task, adding any attempts to euthanize even a single beluga would require “significant staff”, equipment and specialized tools.

“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs requests for the whales to be removed immediately from the facility, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a proposal to export the whales to China.

“Granting the request would have meant a continued existence in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As the public, we know that whales are meant for the wild, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing approve an relocation that would prolong the conditions these belugas have suffered.”

But Burgess said the minister’s remarks indicate a broader lack of awareness of the circumstances of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t comprehend that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As officials work to find a resolution, proposals have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of northern regions – where whales are a important part of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A planned sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which has received government approval, has shown to be contentious. The prospective site, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Advocates remain optimistic that it could in time represent a sustainable resolution for some of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the prospect of a sanctuary indicates a worldwide trend away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible solution in the short term.

An official, director of the sanctuary project, said the site will mimic the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger space. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|